And in the "Sahih Muslim" comes on the authority of Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with both, that he said: "The Mushriks used to say "Labayk (At your obedience) there is no partner to You". He said: then the Messenger of Allah ﷺ would say: "Woe to you stop stop", and they would say: "Except a partner of Yours who You own and what they own". They would say this whilst making Tawaaf around the Ka'bah". End of speech.
Amr bin 'Abasa As-Sulami, may Allah be pleased with him, said: "I, whilst in pre-Islamic ignorance, used to think the people were upon misguidance, and that they weren't upon anything [of worth] when they were worshiping idols". Reported by Muslim in his "Sahih" (2/208).
And in the "the Sahih": that Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, said: O Messenger of Allah, we used to be in pre-Islamic ignorance and evil". End of speech.
So the Tawheed of Allah the most high and the negation of Shirk is an affair which Allah placed in the natural predisposition and the intellect beares witness to the despicability of Shirk before the sending of the Message, as it is [a cause for punishment, but it is -i.e the punishment- pending upon the condition, and this is the evidence] as states by Shaykh-Ul-Islaam, may Allah have mercy upon him (1).
As [Shirk being Shirk, it was Shirk before and after the prohibition (came), whoever says: That immorality and despicable acts and sins only as such after the prohibition came, then this is on the level as saying Shirk only became Shirk after the prohibition of it, and it wasn't Shirk before this.
And it's well known that this, and that, is straight stubbornness against the intellect and natural predisposition. Oppression is oppression before the prohibition and after, and the despicable is despicable in and on itself before the prohibition and after, similarly immorality, and likewise Shirk, not that these things became as such by way of the legislation.
Yes, the legislation covered it in despicability on top of its despicability, so its despicability was due to its essence, so it increased in despicability with the intellect by way of the Lord prohibiting it, and Him casting blame on it, and Him informing that He hates it, and that He hates those that commit it. Like justice and truthfulness and repaying the goodness of those that give it by praise and being thankful is good in and on itself, and it increased in goodness by the Lord commanding it, and praising those that are as such, and Him informing that He loves it and loves that are as such ...
Similar His, exalted is He, rebuking the despicableness of Shirk in singling Him out in worship, and the worshipping of others alongside Him, and what He drew of parables of them in, and He established the invalidity of it through intellectual proofs, if it was only impermissible through the legislation then those proofs and parables wouldn't carry any meaning.
And with the negators of ˹Tahseen˺ and ˹Taqbeeh˺ it's possible that He can command with Shirk and the worship of others, and that being despicable is a only known through the warning from it! How amazing! What benefit remains with those parables and those binding evidences and proofs which point to it being despicable to the sound mind and natural predisposition, and that it's from the most despicable of the despicable, and the most oppressive of oppression? And what other thing makes sense in the intellect if there wasn't any knowledge in it which points to the despicability of the essence of Shirk, and that the knowledge of the despicability thereof is in the natural predisposition, known from the religion by necessity of intellect, and that the Messengers informed the nations with what their intellect natural predisposition found despicable, and that its perpetrators don't have intellect to them nor understanding nor hearts]. End of speech from of Imam Ibn-Ul-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, from <Madaarij As-Saalikeen> (1/366,372).
And in the "Sahih Muslim" comes on the authority of Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with both, that he said: "The Mushriks used to say "Labayk (At your obedience) there is no partner to You". He said: then the Messenger of Allah ﷺ would say: "Woe to you stop stop", and they would say: "Except a partner of Yours who You own and what they own". They would say this whilst making Tawaaf around the Ka'bah". End of speech.
Amr bin 'Abasa As-Sulami, may Allah be pleased with him, said: "I, whilst in pre-Islamic ignorance, used to think the people were upon misguidance, and that they weren't upon anything [of worth] when they were worshiping idols". Reported by Muslim in his "Sahih" (2/208).
And in the "the Sahih": that Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, said: O Messenger of Allah, we used to be in pre-Islamic ignorance and evil". End of speech.
So the Tawheed of Allah the most high and the negation of Shirk is an affair which Allah placed in the natural predisposition and the intellect beares witness to the despicability of Shirk before the sending of the Message, as it is [a cause for punishment, but it is -i.e the punishment- pending upon the condition, and this is the evidence] as states by Shaykh-Ul-Islaam, may Allah have mercy upon him (1).
As [Shirk being Shirk, it was Shirk before and after the prohibition (came), whoever says: That immorality and despicable acts and sins only as such after the prohibition came, then this is on the level as saying Shirk only became Shirk after the prohibition of it, and it wasn't Shirk before this.
And it's well known that this, and that, is straight stubbornness against the intellect and natural predisposition. Oppression is oppression before the prohibition and after, and the despicable is despicable in and on itself before the prohibition and after, similarly immorality, and likewise Shirk, not that these things became as such by way of the legislation.
Yes, the legislation covered it in despicability on top of its despicability, so its despicability was due to its essence, so it increased in despicability with the intellect by way of the Lord prohibiting it, and Him casting blame on it, and Him informing that He hates it, and that He hates those that commit it. Like justice and truthfulness and repaying the goodness of those that give it by praise and being thankful is good in and on itself, and it increased in goodness by the Lord commanding it, and praising those that are as such, and Him informing that He loves it and loves that are as such ...
Similar His, exalted is He, rebuking the despicableness of Shirk in singling Him out in worship, and the worshipping of others alongside Him, and what He drew of parables of them in, and He established the invalidity of it through intellectual proofs, if it was only impermissible through the legislation then those proofs and parables wouldn't carry any meaning.
And with the negators of ˹Tahseen˺ and ˹Taqbeeh˺ it's possible that He can command with Shirk and the worship of others, and that being despicable is a only known through the warning from it! How amazing! What benefit remains with those parables and those binding evidences and proofs which point to it being despicable to the sound mind and natural predisposition, and that it's from the most despicable of the despicable, and the most oppressive of oppression? And what other thing makes sense in the intellect if there wasn't any knowledge in it which points to the despicability of the essence of Shirk, and that the knowledge of the despicability thereof is in the natural predisposition, known from the religion by necessity of intellect, and that the Messengers informed the nations with what their intellect natural predisposition found despicable, and that its perpetrators don't have intellect to them nor understanding nor hearts]. End of speech from of Imam Ibn-Ul-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, from <Madaarij As-Saalikeen> (1/366,372).
[Page 23]
BY The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al-'Inaabi Al-Jazaa'iree
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 280
Among the actives, Ascendas REIT sank 0.64 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust plummeted 1.42 percent, City Developments plunged 1.12 percent, Dairy Farm International tumbled 0.86 percent, DBS Group skidded 0.68 percent, Genting Singapore retreated 0.67 percent, Hongkong Land climbed 1.30 percent, Mapletree Commercial Trust lost 0.47 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust tanked 0.95 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation dropped 0.61 percent, SATS rose 0.24 percent, SembCorp Industries shed 0.54 percent, Singapore Airlines surrendered 0.79 percent, Singapore Exchange slid 0.30 percent, Singapore Press Holdings declined 1.03 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering dipped 0.26 percent, SingTel advanced 0.81 percent, United Overseas Bank fell 0.39 percent, Wilmar International eased 0.24 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding jumped 1.42 percent and Keppel Corp, Thai Beverage, CapitaLand and Comfort DelGro were unchanged.
How to Buy Bitcoin?
Most people buy Bitcoin via exchanges, such as Coinbase. Exchanges allow you to buy, sell and hold cryptocurrency, and setting up an account is similar to opening a brokerage account—you’ll need to verify your identity and provide some kind of funding source, such as a bank account or debit card. Major exchanges include Coinbase, Kraken, and Gemini. You can also buy Bitcoin at a broker like Robinhood. Regardless of where you buy your Bitcoin, you’ll need a digital wallet in which to store it. This might be what’s called a hot wallet or a cold wallet. A hot wallet (also called an online wallet) is stored by an exchange or a provider in the cloud. Providers of online wallets include Exodus, Electrum and Mycelium. A cold wallet (or mobile wallet) is an offline device used to store Bitcoin and is not connected to the Internet. Some mobile wallet options include Trezor and Ledger.
The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al & 39;Inaabi Al Jazaa& 39;iree from us
