tg-me.com/BNXZUF/8137
Last Update:
BY ๐ุฏู ุนุฉ๐ููู ๐
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/hsiMgV9kf3STz2P31kXxxDjpVHI-9T0QeaaoVNER2uLoWNZ1TRyy8NIGwwb1g1yB30gD-6ssHyz7cmL_E3zG0Xnx7lFB698mft3ecuUNpD4lvGOdqATr3Z9aEiM_F0TbbZAMD7BAUJxd640_4ZX6F5iv56wJ9ET87hQCV7nwYk1zi0sgnFzF1zy5ost1q3jY7-BbR062rn-CfaHUxUkhrj2OPPO7kqW1Y9nor_wFVvOk33vGGO8QZb8PMvyvyMEnFBnE5_6OVKB7SvyMg6s1RXoENYiOFi3LsDT9B-e3QbDI66g43F8-DV9clsa8hVs1qhk6286lnSXBstnwTKwslA.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/BNXZUF/8137
BY ๐ุฏู ุนุฉ๐ููู ๐
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
ุฏู ุนุฉููู from us