tg-me.com/hafidat_assalaf_tig/17395
Last Update:
BY حفيدة السلف الجزائرية
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/CjmGOOHU3sG2VO_YBLTyicADKYbGMPs1wd0DejQsBvDOHj9dt6mjh3kMZqS-Fh8Eps2t-EYcaD1dstJrLU0L2SItcDHyaJL5vFUSU2oH-p5_M4MI7mfXQb_I14riy5E4KLnK5E4hm0cd6mMbuxpBHtQvjPLz7W2p7-_qEA6BLDDa7QMAPbg-M2An-eLJYUXeMkrVerFg3Y7147DIsWTlNgc4q9fH6fywvhlMZ73a6_gq-4zbLsvRPr-9bSsXhwPQVWxlaHQhbMVIcPtJcKxGV7oRdQpYiMzjubX_zSFaNKdjnKSwMs5EU4iaTVOiR0af5ksgkg8IZciTCmLdR5FjtA.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/hafidat_assalaf_tig/17395
BY حفيدة السلف الجزائرية
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
حفيدة السلف الجزائرية from us