‏شہۣۗہۣۣۣۗۗۗوۣۗقۣۗ❤وۣۗحۣۗنۣۣۗۗہۣۗہۣۗيہۣۗہۣۗنۣۣۣۗۗۗ ۣۣۗۗۦ

‏شہۣۗہۣۣۣۗۗۗوۣۗقۣۗوۣۗحۣۗنۣۣۗۗہۣۗہۣۗيہۣۗہۣۗنۣۣۣۗۗۗ ۣۣۗۗۦ Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.

The lead from Wall Street offers little clarity as the major averages opened lower on Friday and then bounced back and forth across the unchanged line, finally finishing mixed and little changed.The Dow added 33.18 points or 0.10 percent to finish at 34,798.00, while the NASDAQ eased 4.54 points or 0.03 percent to close at 15,047.70 and the S&P 500 rose 6.50 points or 0.15 percent to end at 4,455.48. For the week, the Dow rose 0.6 percent, the NASDAQ added 0.1 percent and the S&P gained 0.5 percent.The lackluster performance on Wall Street came on uncertainty about the outlook for the markets following recent volatility.