A man had 10⅔kg of onions and sold ⅔ of it. How much does he have left?
If 10kg is your answer, you are so wrong. The question didn't say he sold ⅔kg of the onions, he sold ⅔ of the entire onions.
So how much is ⅔ of 10⅔: 10⅔ = ³²⁄₃ ⅔ of that ³²⁄₃ x ⅔ 64 ÷ 9 = 7⅑
But wait, that's not what the question asked, the question was how much he had left, not how much he sold.
So how much he had left will be (10⅔ - 7⅑) or simply (⅓ of 10⅔) [you will arrive at the same answer either way]. so, ⅓ of 10⅔: ³²⁄₃ x ⅓ 32 ÷ 9 = 3⁵⁄₉
Answer: 3⁵⁄₉
I spotted the error in the options after several people have voted so I decided to leave it in because whoever got the correct answer should know it was just an error.
A man had 10⅔kg of onions and sold ⅔ of it. How much does he have left?
If 10kg is your answer, you are so wrong. The question didn't say he sold ⅔kg of the onions, he sold ⅔ of the entire onions.
So how much is ⅔ of 10⅔: 10⅔ = ³²⁄₃ ⅔ of that ³²⁄₃ x ⅔ 64 ÷ 9 = 7⅑
But wait, that's not what the question asked, the question was how much he had left, not how much he sold.
So how much he had left will be (10⅔ - 7⅑) or simply (⅓ of 10⅔) [you will arrive at the same answer either way]. so, ⅓ of 10⅔: ³²⁄₃ x ⅓ 32 ÷ 9 = 3⁵⁄₉
Answer: 3⁵⁄₉
I spotted the error in the options after several people have voted so I decided to leave it in because whoever got the correct answer should know it was just an error.
BY Riddles Repository - Answers
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
The STAR Market, as is implied by the name, is heavily geared toward smaller innovative tech companies, in particular those engaged in strategically important fields, such as biopharmaceuticals, 5G technology, semiconductors, and new energy. The STAR Market currently has 340 listed securities. The STAR Market is seen as important for China’s high-tech and emerging industries, providing a space for smaller companies to raise capital in China. This is especially significant for technology companies that may be viewed with suspicion on overseas stock exchanges.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
