A 100m train training at 100m/s needs to clear a track of 100m. How many seconds will it take?
A 100m train wants to clear a track of 100m. When the train travels 100m, it will be sitting perfectly on the track but remember, it needed to clear it. So the train, needs to travel another 100m to completely clear the track.
Total distance travelled = 2 x 100m = 200m How many seconds will it take the train?
A 100m train training at 100m/s needs to clear a track of 100m. How many seconds will it take?
A 100m train wants to clear a track of 100m. When the train travels 100m, it will be sitting perfectly on the track but remember, it needed to clear it. So the train, needs to travel another 100m to completely clear the track.
Total distance travelled = 2 x 100m = 200m How many seconds will it take the train?
v = d ÷ t t = d ÷ v
t = 200m ÷ 100m/s t = 2s
Answer: 2s
BY Riddles Repository - Answers
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
