Only Study Official ©

Chatgpt summary on above judgement

## Case Summary of O.A. No. 628 of 2023

Parties:

* Applicants: 13 individuals seeking appointment to the post of Surveyor and Clerk-Typist in the Land Records Department.
* Respondents: The State of Maharashtra, the Settlement Commissioner and Director of Land Records, and the Deputy Director Land Records.

Background:

* The applicants applied for the advertised posts based on their qualifications and eligibility.
* They were shortlisted and appeared for the written examination.
* Based on their marks, they were included in the select/waiting list.
* The advertisement had reserved 29 posts for ex-servicemen, but only 4 ex-servicemen were available.
* The remaining 25 posts were kept vacant.
* The applicants argued that they should be appointed to these vacant posts based on their rank in the respective categories.

Judgment:

* The applicants relied on Government Resolutions and a Bombay High Court judgment stating that if ex-servicemen are not available, candidates from the same category should be appointed.
* The Tribunal agreed with the applicants' argument and directed the respondents to appoint them to the vacant posts.
* The order was to be complied with within three months.

Key Points:

* The case highlights the importance of following reservation policies and ensuring equal opportunities for all eligible candidates.
* It also emphasizes the need to utilize available resources and fill vacant positions promptly.

Additional Information:

* The judgment was delivered on May 9, 2024.
* The name of applicant no. 6 was deleted as they were already appointed.
* No order was given regarding costs.

Disclaimer:

This summary is based on the provided document and does not constitute legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date legal information, please consult a qualified professional.

Join @only_stdy

www.tg-me.com/us/Only Study Official ©/com.only_stdy/3896

7.6K viewsedited  May 9 at 12:24

Chatgpt summary on above judgement

## Case Summary of O.A. No. 628 of 2023

Parties:

* Applicants: 13 individuals seeking appointment to the post of Surveyor and Clerk-Typist in the Land Records Department.
* Respondents: The State of Maharashtra, the Settlement Commissioner and Director of Land Records, and the Deputy Director Land Records.

Background:

* The applicants applied for the advertised posts based on their qualifications and eligibility.
* They were shortlisted and appeared for the written examination.
* Based on their marks, they were included in the select/waiting list.
* The advertisement had reserved 29 posts for ex-servicemen, but only 4 ex-servicemen were available.
* The remaining 25 posts were kept vacant.
* The applicants argued that they should be appointed to these vacant posts based on their rank in the respective categories.

Judgment:

* The applicants relied on Government Resolutions and a Bombay High Court judgment stating that if ex-servicemen are not available, candidates from the same category should be appointed.
* The Tribunal agreed with the applicants' argument and directed the respondents to appoint them to the vacant posts.
* The order was to be complied with within three months.

Key Points:

* The case highlights the importance of following reservation policies and ensuring equal opportunities for all eligible candidates.
* It also emphasizes the need to utilize available resources and fill vacant positions promptly.

Additional Information:

* The judgment was delivered on May 9, 2024.
* The name of applicant no. 6 was deleted as they were already appointed.
* No order was given regarding costs.

Disclaimer:

This summary is based on the provided document and does not constitute legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date legal information, please consult a qualified professional.

Join @only_stdy

BY Only Study Official ©