tg-me.com/smoodf/96648
Last Update:
BY -
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/MjI6y3s4jTRSMO9ol7K87rRRxktR52LIF6Ma6yi4hfYGZ1EtJ6oW1ffykXZJg_W78BgX9BmAUeLrzpkfxtnWU7KEIXpgEx4DNAg4afOkMNzDDNOv-VBXQDah8Rryn7sf_U7Hv1TVH0qJ3KztEuSRGUFVx_IbZSzXI02rYJIdijSnwpFyeFfO4FJIeU1oJm1wef9DT1bksXBviJWGy8iQhbljBcgkX6JUcsktbAbcAA8pQcM96pGBkdP4RDuE5X2a0Thtnq-B9hrrXoYKBNYhHAchUFQdL5mx-YHxOhAbQURDbqshjKBUnyaq9981DNm9E_K-rn0cxqpz-eKrJsBvvw.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/smoodf/96648
BY -
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
from us