- * Ψ₯ΩΩΩ ΩΨ±ΩΨ― ΩΨ³ΨͺΩ ΩΩΩΩΩΩΨ§Ψͺ Ψ§ΩΨ£Ψ―Ψ¨ΩΩΩΨ© ΩΨ§ΩΩ
Ψ±ΨͺΨ¨Ψ© πΈ.
- * ΩΨ¨ΩΨ΄Ψ± ΩΨΨ°Ω ΨͺΩΩΨ§Ψ¦Ω βοΈ.
- * Ω
ΨΉ Ψ―ΨΉΩ
ΩΨ±Ψ―Ω ππ.
- * ΩΩΨ₯Ψ΄ΨͺΨ±ΩΨ’Ω Ψ§ΩΩΨ¨ΩΩ +100 π .
- * Ψ±Ψ§Ψ³Ω : @c7iiit π»
BY π€ ππ·πΎ
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
π€ ππ·πΎ from us