LibreCryptography

AES Has Been Shown to be of Questionable Security in a Number of Different Cryptanalysis Studies Dating Back to 1999 (when it was first released)

This may be presumptuous, but based on a second look at literature, it may be prudent for the cryptography community to begin distancing itself form AES (sooner than later).

Cryptanalysis attacks against AES include:

1. DA (differential analysis); this is analyzing the actual computations being done by the hardware machine as the cipher operation is taking place. (https://eprint.iacr.org/2003/010.pdf)

2. Side-channel attacks (extremely effective on full round AES-256) [https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf]

3. 'Algebraic Attacks' (https://www.cosic.esat.kuleuven.be/ecrypt/AESday/slides/AES-Day-CarlosCid.pdf)

www.tg-me.com/us/LibreCryptography/com.librecryptography/196

55 viewsNov 25, 2020 at 20:48

AES Has Been Shown to be of Questionable Security in a Number of Different Cryptanalysis Studies Dating Back to 1999 (when it was first released)

This may be presumptuous, but based on a second look at literature, it may be prudent for the cryptography community to begin distancing itself form AES (sooner than later).

Cryptanalysis attacks against AES include:

1. DA (differential analysis); this is analyzing the actual computations being done by the hardware machine as the cipher operation is taking place. (https://eprint.iacr.org/2003/010.pdf)

2. Side-channel attacks (extremely effective on full round AES-256) [https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf]

3. 'Algebraic Attacks' (https://www.cosic.esat.kuleuven.be/ecrypt/AESday/slides/AES-Day-CarlosCid.pdf)

BY LibreCryptography