ΠΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ°Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ°Π±Π»Π΅, ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠ΅ Π΅Π³ΠΎ, ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°ΠΉΡΠ΅ΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΡΠΉΡΠ΅ Π² Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Π΅, Π²ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²Π»Ρ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠ° Π·Π° Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ.
βͺ Github
@cpluspluc
BY Github
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
I have no inside knowledge of a potential stock listing of the popular anti-Whatsapp messaging app, Telegram. But I know this much, judging by most people I talk to, especially crypto investors, if Telegram ever went public, people would gobble it up. I know I would. Iβm waiting for it. So is Sergei Sergienko, who claims he owns $800,000 of Telegramβs pre-initial coin offering (ICO) tokens. βIf Telegram does a SPAC IPO, there would be demand for this issue. It would probably outstrip the interest we saw during the ICO. Why? Because as of right now Telegram looks like a liberal application that can accept anyone - right after WhatsApp and others have turn on the censorship,β he says.
Github from ar