tg-me.com/vlllj/2624
Last Update:
BY silence.
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/cjKlJsVp5-kclhGmH7Fq47xJW3ymM5qCa6LUdYK2WyXSrBBM6W27B-sV0uc4fsiyPc_DUCFBKBqI__csuHQhOucHpp4DY2oZq38hyRu9MKp_5iswNcP49yVkTC22RgFm7aSSAyj4YZ2ZY3gqhCykx9Dvy2Xw3XNmUuyNrsJqUHjTJ-IkJUYIhtIi2iRV7RR3DJfJA7Cw6eRlvEJtf5r-rboQHLCTMzVkyMlx53kh0ShD6WH10WMK-0BiXX9n0_BXoAaC8j7YsTtlzIZGeI7J64mD3SL1G-kYzheXYC4JiZRa8LTKKPi5AtcNl6WFiwFYjlnZ2EOd5JSOzPbHLWDpYA.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/vlllj/2624
BY silence.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
ظَلام from ar