tg-me.com/Mostafanaaa/443
Last Update:
حاجة زي أخبار تناغم من جريدة...💙
BY مصطفانا💙
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/ESNf56o59Cy1Hsyrhj8QBNbMEe606HuhOl-plmQPnS5SfPNac7MAehTPkPUWFuCDjoJYFHhCu36gzu5guV5shyd37bZYZGWaQo7LAW3vUk6uiPe-AxvUy5-PQOaju2quLbcDmPn7hs1s5NacfwIUarY_6Csj_l5e0ss2g5XXhSlMsiL53pqFbGdH-5HWK0lIMTrAD5yzYtdFjsWeSsGMuGTIXsJE0DswCL0kiCLOsaDBsxUkjAWGZ95yJzzkzUPV_el1FRZMzWiNglNfmEQO-cBM3R2rEwUad4uxGDg5JvuGEhhObPkOk0NYD2JtraycfxHasAanEvQBqfvDZ6cJuQ.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/Mostafanaaa/443
حاجة زي أخبار تناغم من جريدة...💙
BY مصطفانا💙
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
مصطفانا from ca