❌ A. num1 == num2 and num3 == num4 ✅ B. num1 == num2 and num3 != num4 ❌ C. num1 != num2 and num3 == num4 ❌ D. num1 != num2 and num3 != num4 ❌ E. The code does not compile ❌ F. A runtime exception is thrown
Explanation: We always thought that whenever two object references are compared using “==”, it always evaluates to “false”. But here Integer caching changes the results. Integer class has a caching range of -128 to 127. Whenever a number is between this range and autoboxing is used, it assigns the same reference. That’s why for value 100, both num1 and num2 will have the same reference, but for the value 500 (not in the range of -128 to 127), num3 and num4 will have different reference.
❌ A. num1 == num2 and num3 == num4 ✅ B. num1 == num2 and num3 != num4 ❌ C. num1 != num2 and num3 == num4 ❌ D. num1 != num2 and num3 != num4 ❌ E. The code does not compile ❌ F. A runtime exception is thrown
Explanation: We always thought that whenever two object references are compared using “==”, it always evaluates to “false”. But here Integer caching changes the results. Integer class has a caching range of -128 to 127. Whenever a number is between this range and autoboxing is used, it assigns the same reference. That’s why for value 100, both num1 and num2 will have the same reference, but for the value 500 (not in the range of -128 to 127), num3 and num4 will have different reference.
BY Explanations “Top Java Quiz Questions”
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
In many cases, the content resembled that of the marketplaces found on the dark web, a group of hidden websites that are popular among hackers and accessed using specific anonymising software.“We have recently been witnessing a 100 per cent-plus rise in Telegram usage by cybercriminals,” said Tal Samra, cyber threat analyst at Cyberint.The rise in nefarious activity comes as users flocked to the encrypted chat app earlier this year after changes to the privacy policy of Facebook-owned rival WhatsApp prompted many to seek out alternatives.
Pinterest (PINS) Stock Sinks As Market Gains
Pinterest (PINS) closed at $71.75 in the latest trading session, marking a -0.18% move from the prior day. This change lagged the S&P 500's daily gain of 0.1%. Meanwhile, the Dow gained 0.9%, and the Nasdaq, a tech-heavy index, lost 0.59%.
Heading into today, shares of the digital pinboard and shopping tool company had lost 17.41% over the past month, lagging the Computer and Technology sector's loss of 5.38% and the S&P 500's gain of 0.71% in that time.
Investors will be hoping for strength from PINS as it approaches its next earnings release. The company is expected to report EPS of $0.07, up 170% from the prior-year quarter. Our most recent consensus estimate is calling for quarterly revenue of $467.87 million, up 72.05% from the year-ago period.
