impl Drop for Tracer { fn drop(&mut self) { println!("Dropping {}", self.0); } }
struct Test { a: Tracer, b: Tracer, }
fn main() { let mut t = Test { a: Tracer::new("A"), b: Tracer::new("B"), };
mem::replace(&mut t.a, Tracer::new("X"));
println!("Midpoint"); }
✅ОТВЕТ: ```Creating A Creating B Creating X Dropping A Midpoint Dropping B Dropping X ```
1. Создание: Tracer::new("A") → Creating A 2. mem::replace(...): Creating XDropping A 3. println!("Midpoint"): Midpoint 4. Drop поля: B, затем X Этот код демонстрирует поведение Drop при замене полей структуры в Rust через std::mem::replace.
impl Drop for Tracer { fn drop(&mut self) { println!("Dropping {}", self.0); } }
struct Test { a: Tracer, b: Tracer, }
fn main() { let mut t = Test { a: Tracer::new("A"), b: Tracer::new("B"), };
mem::replace(&mut t.a, Tracer::new("X"));
println!("Midpoint"); }
✅ОТВЕТ: ```Creating A Creating B Creating X Dropping A Midpoint Dropping B Dropping X ```
1. Создание: Tracer::new("A") → Creating A 2. mem::replace(...): Creating XDropping A 3. println!("Midpoint"): Midpoint 4. Drop поля: B, затем X Этот код демонстрирует поведение Drop при замене полей структуры в Rust через std::mem::replace.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.