Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 37

Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/elevemberreview/--): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 50
十三月评论 | Telegram Webview: elevemberreview/76 -
Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
端传媒的作者“吉汉”(就是2019年那篇讲述工人在八九民运中作用的文章、以及2020年那篇讨论重庆模式的文章的作者)在消失了三年多之后,新近发表一篇长文,评述了学者魏昂德(Andrew Walder)2019年以来接连出版的三部文革研究专著:https://theinitium.com/zh-Hans/article/20231023-opinion-cultrual-revolution-research-andrew-walder-reflections

本文对魏昂德这一系列文革研究所提供的历史叙事、分析视角、研究发现梳理得比较系统,并进一步在理解文革的范式层面给出了几点拓展性的思考,也包括对魏昂德研究范式的批评。文章最后认为,文革初期的群众造反运动确有可能发展成真正意义上的革命运动,但这一可能性在1967年初被中共统治者自上而下地以“革命”的名义阻断了。这个具有争议性的结论,也为进一步的深入思考打开了许多空间。推荐对文革历史感兴趣的朋友们细读本文。

点击这一链接可以跃过付费墙直接阅读全文:https://labourwiki.org/theinitium/20231023-1.html 但还是鼓励大家成为端的订阅用户,支持运营不易的独立媒体~



tg-me.com/elevemberreview/76
Create:
Last Update:

端传媒的作者“吉汉”(就是2019年那篇讲述工人在八九民运中作用的文章、以及2020年那篇讨论重庆模式的文章的作者)在消失了三年多之后,新近发表一篇长文,评述了学者魏昂德(Andrew Walder)2019年以来接连出版的三部文革研究专著:https://theinitium.com/zh-Hans/article/20231023-opinion-cultrual-revolution-research-andrew-walder-reflections

本文对魏昂德这一系列文革研究所提供的历史叙事、分析视角、研究发现梳理得比较系统,并进一步在理解文革的范式层面给出了几点拓展性的思考,也包括对魏昂德研究范式的批评。文章最后认为,文革初期的群众造反运动确有可能发展成真正意义上的革命运动,但这一可能性在1967年初被中共统治者自上而下地以“革命”的名义阻断了。这个具有争议性的结论,也为进一步的深入思考打开了许多空间。推荐对文革历史感兴趣的朋友们细读本文。

点击这一链接可以跃过付费墙直接阅读全文:https://labourwiki.org/theinitium/20231023-1.html 但还是鼓励大家成为端的订阅用户,支持运营不易的独立媒体~

BY 十三月评论




Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/elevemberreview/76

View MORE
Open in Telegram


十三月评论 Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Telegram Gives Up On Crypto Blockchain Project

Durov said on his Telegram channel today that the two and a half year blockchain and crypto project has been put to sleep. Ironically, after leaving Russia because the government wanted his encryption keys to his social media firm, Durov’s cryptocurrency idea lost steam because of a U.S. court. “The technology we created allowed for an open, free, decentralized exchange of value and ideas. TON had the potential to revolutionize how people store and transfer funds and information,” he wrote on his channel. “Unfortunately, a U.S. court stopped TON from happening.”

Why Telegram?

Telegram has no known backdoors and, even though it is come in for criticism for using proprietary encryption methods instead of open-source ones, those have yet to be compromised. While no messaging app can guarantee a 100% impermeable defense against determined attackers, Telegram is vulnerabilities are few and either theoretical or based on spoof files fooling users into actively enabling an attack.

十三月评论 from fr


Telegram 十三月评论
FROM USA