Join us this week for an in-depth discussion on Compositional Learning in the context of cutting-edge text-to-image generative models. We will explore recent breakthroughs and challenges, focusing on how these models handle compositional tasks and where improvements can be made.
🌀 Abstract: This paper investigates the misuse of text-conditional diffusion models, particularly text-to-image models, which create visually appealing images based on user descriptions. While these images generally represent harmless concepts, they can be manipulated for harmful purposes like propaganda. The authors show that adversaries can introduce biases through backdoor attacks, affecting even well-meaning users. Despite users verifying image-text alignment, the attack remains hidden by preserving the text's semantic content while altering other image features to embed biases, amplifying them by 4-8 times. The study reveals that current generative models make such attacks cost-effective and feasible, with costs ranging from 12 to 18 units. Various triggers, objectives, and biases are evaluated, with discussions on mitigations and future research directions.
Join us this week for an in-depth discussion on Compositional Learning in the context of cutting-edge text-to-image generative models. We will explore recent breakthroughs and challenges, focusing on how these models handle compositional tasks and where improvements can be made.
🌀 Abstract: This paper investigates the misuse of text-conditional diffusion models, particularly text-to-image models, which create visually appealing images based on user descriptions. While these images generally represent harmless concepts, they can be manipulated for harmful purposes like propaganda. The authors show that adversaries can introduce biases through backdoor attacks, affecting even well-meaning users. Despite users verifying image-text alignment, the attack remains hidden by preserving the text's semantic content while altering other image features to embed biases, amplifying them by 4-8 times. The study reveals that current generative models make such attacks cost-effective and feasible, with costs ranging from 12 to 18 units. Various triggers, objectives, and biases are evaluated, with discussions on mitigations and future research directions.
A leaked Telegram discussion by 50 so-called crypto influencers has exposed the extraordinary steps they take in order to profit on the back off unsuspecting defi investors. According to a leaked screenshot of the chat, an elaborate plan to defraud defi investors using the worthless “$Few” tokens had been hatched. $Few tokens would be airdropped to some of the influencers who in turn promoted these to unsuspecting followers on Twitter.
Should You Buy Bitcoin?
In general, many financial experts support their clients’ desire to buy cryptocurrency, but they don’t recommend it unless clients express interest. “The biggest concern for us is if someone wants to invest in crypto and the investment they choose doesn’t do well, and then all of a sudden they can’t send their kids to college,” says Ian Harvey, a certified financial planner (CFP) in New York City. “Then it wasn’t worth the risk.” The speculative nature of cryptocurrency leads some planners to recommend it for clients’ “side” investments. “Some call it a Vegas account,” says Scott Hammel, a CFP in Dallas. “Let’s keep this away from our real long-term perspective, make sure it doesn’t become too large a portion of your portfolio.” In a very real sense, Bitcoin is like a single stock, and advisors wouldn’t recommend putting a sizable part of your portfolio into any one company. At most, planners suggest putting no more than 1% to 10% into Bitcoin if you’re passionate about it. “If it was one stock, you would never allocate any significant portion of your portfolio to it,” Hammel says.
