❌ A. true ✅ B. false ❌ C. The code will not compile because of line 2 ❌ D. The code will not compile because of line 5 ❌ E. The code will not compile because of line 7 ❌ F. The code will not compile because of line 8
Explanation: This code compiles and runs without issue, outputting false, so option B is the correct answer. The first declaration of isBlind() is as a default interface method, assumed public. The second declaration of isBlind() correctly overrides the default interface method. Finally, the newly created Owl instance may be automatically cast to a Nocturnal reference without an explicit cast, although adding it doesn’t break the code.
❌ A. true ✅ B. false ❌ C. The code will not compile because of line 2 ❌ D. The code will not compile because of line 5 ❌ E. The code will not compile because of line 7 ❌ F. The code will not compile because of line 8
Explanation: This code compiles and runs without issue, outputting false, so option B is the correct answer. The first declaration of isBlind() is as a default interface method, assumed public. The second declaration of isBlind() correctly overrides the default interface method. Finally, the newly created Owl instance may be automatically cast to a Nocturnal reference without an explicit cast, although adding it doesn’t break the code.
BY Explanations “Top Java Quiz Questions”
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
A project of our size needs at least a few hundred million dollars per year to keep going,” Mr. Durov wrote in his public channel on Telegram late last year. “While doing that, we will remain independent and stay true to our values, redefining how a tech company should operate.
