tg-me.com/coffee1n/17585
Last Update:
BY attempt
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/Nk-5qf9Jtt_utzBO4Klx-RIrLPePiYtTQp2rpct00e9Xi6p2P5YVBhmSiW5Q1VMg2dx-PmlXdlj89wEjkoDclCxPef0_AK90qp--C_ILnd5bWn_ZPg4drFf7SCfpnpeRLA_T9D-XLKiJrbiqTV2ZgblszOQik07DjBW-IVHQ94f5RjD43aVmsdaUcJyATT8lGrTfzVls2Rpv3zNg7uOAy5BsFzOmV0CQH8JBmgs4DYfALINJu_T9vcMvERA2DRb6lvPiEWU1NWCPkUEtEZwif6F7JjSZuEb3OigOBvY_aSvTUBLafAYCr1zSLdGhep6JAVkLS7n5qhhUClUHTivoYw.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/coffee1n/17585
BY attempt
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
attempt from nl