Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Google搜索技巧几种:

❶ 双引号:搜索精确字串匹配。示例:"精确字串匹配"
❷ 减号:去除带有某些匹配的搜索结果。示例:海豚 -海豚湾
❸ 波浪号:模糊搜索。示例:音乐 ~网课
❹ site关键词:搜索特定网站内的结果。示例:音乐 site:tumblr.com
❺ 竖号:搜索匹配A或匹配B的结果。示例:海豚 | 海豹
❻ 两个点:搜索数字范围的匹配。示例:电影 1980..2000
❼ filetype关键词:搜索特定文件类型。示例:拜登 filetype:pdf source



tg-me.com/useless_project_ideas/671
Create:
Last Update:

Google搜索技巧几种:

❶ 双引号:搜索精确字串匹配。示例:"精确字串匹配"
❷ 减号:去除带有某些匹配的搜索结果。示例:海豚 -海豚湾
❸ 波浪号:模糊搜索。示例:音乐 ~网课
❹ site关键词:搜索特定网站内的结果。示例:音乐 site:tumblr.com
❺ 竖号:搜索匹配A或匹配B的结果。示例:海豚 | 海豹
❻ 两个点:搜索数字范围的匹配。示例:电影 1980..2000
❼ filetype关键词:搜索特定文件类型。示例:拜登 filetype:pdf source

BY 程序员之家


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283

Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/useless_project_ideas/671

View MORE
Open in Telegram


【程序员之家】软件项目百例 Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Among the actives, Ascendas REIT sank 0.64 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust plummeted 1.42 percent, City Developments plunged 1.12 percent, Dairy Farm International tumbled 0.86 percent, DBS Group skidded 0.68 percent, Genting Singapore retreated 0.67 percent, Hongkong Land climbed 1.30 percent, Mapletree Commercial Trust lost 0.47 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust tanked 0.95 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation dropped 0.61 percent, SATS rose 0.24 percent, SembCorp Industries shed 0.54 percent, Singapore Airlines surrendered 0.79 percent, Singapore Exchange slid 0.30 percent, Singapore Press Holdings declined 1.03 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering dipped 0.26 percent, SingTel advanced 0.81 percent, United Overseas Bank fell 0.39 percent, Wilmar International eased 0.24 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding jumped 1.42 percent and Keppel Corp, Thai Beverage, CapitaLand and Comfort DelGro were unchanged.

That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.

【程序员之家】软件项目百例 from no


Telegram 程序员之家
FROM USA