"1 foiz devalvatsiya inflyatsiya suratini 0.4 punktga oshiradi".
Nazarimda, bu bo'g'liqlik undan ham yuqoridek.
Nega devalvatsiya bilan inflyatsiya o'rtasidagi bunday yuqori bog'liqlik mavjud?
Birinchidan, bizdagi import tovarlarning katta qismini iste'mol tovarlari tashkil etadi. Devalvatsiya narxlarning o'sishida yoki importyor sotuvchilarning foydasining kamayishida aks etishi kerak.
Nima deb o'ylaysiz bizda asosan qaysi biri sodir bo'ladi? Menimcha, ko'proq birinchisi.
Ikkinchidan, devalvatsiyaning narxlar o'sishiga ta'siri bilvosita ish haqi orqali ham sodir bo'lishi mumkin. Devalvatsiya va narx-navoning o'sishi ish haqining hozirgi holatiga bosim o'tkazmasdan qolmaydi. Natijada iqtisodiyot "vicious cycle" ga kirib qoladi. Narxlar oshishi, ish haqining ko'tarilishi va yana narxlarning oshishi.
Nima qilish kerak? Dollarga import uchun zarur bo'ladigan talabdan tashqari ehtiyojni pasaytirish zarur. Bu esa qayta-qayta aytganimizdek so'mni barqarorligini ta'minlashni taqozo etadi.
"1 foiz devalvatsiya inflyatsiya suratini 0.4 punktga oshiradi".
Nazarimda, bu bo'g'liqlik undan ham yuqoridek.
Nega devalvatsiya bilan inflyatsiya o'rtasidagi bunday yuqori bog'liqlik mavjud?
Birinchidan, bizdagi import tovarlarning katta qismini iste'mol tovarlari tashkil etadi. Devalvatsiya narxlarning o'sishida yoki importyor sotuvchilarning foydasining kamayishida aks etishi kerak.
Nima deb o'ylaysiz bizda asosan qaysi biri sodir bo'ladi? Menimcha, ko'proq birinchisi.
Ikkinchidan, devalvatsiyaning narxlar o'sishiga ta'siri bilvosita ish haqi orqali ham sodir bo'lishi mumkin. Devalvatsiya va narx-navoning o'sishi ish haqining hozirgi holatiga bosim o'tkazmasdan qolmaydi. Natijada iqtisodiyot "vicious cycle" ga kirib qoladi. Narxlar oshishi, ish haqining ko'tarilishi va yana narxlarning oshishi.
Nima qilish kerak? Dollarga import uchun zarur bo'ladigan talabdan tashqari ehtiyojni pasaytirish zarur. Bu esa qayta-qayta aytganimizdek so'mni barqarorligini ta'minlashni taqozo etadi.
BY MacroBS
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
Durov said on his Telegram channel today that the two and a half year blockchain and crypto project has been put to sleep. Ironically, after leaving Russia because the government wanted his encryption keys to his social media firm, Durov’s cryptocurrency idea lost steam because of a U.S. court. “The technology we created allowed for an open, free, decentralized exchange of value and ideas. TON had the potential to revolutionize how people store and transfer funds and information,” he wrote on his channel. “Unfortunately, a U.S. court stopped TON from happening.”
Should I buy bitcoin?
“To the extent it is used I fear it’s often for illicit finance. It’s an extremely inefficient way of conducting transactions, and the amount of energy that’s consumed in processing those transactions is staggering,” the former Fed chairwoman said. Yellen’s comments have been cited as a reason for bitcoin’s recent losses. However, Yellen’s assessment of bitcoin as a inefficient medium of exchange is an important point and one that has already been raised in the past by bitcoin bulls. Using a volatile asset in exchange for goods and services makes little sense if the asset can tumble 10% in a day, or surge 80% over the course of a two months as bitcoin has done in 2021, critics argue. To put a finer point on it, over the past 12 months bitcoin has registered 8 corrections, defined as a decline from a recent peak of at least 10% but not more than 20%, and two bear markets, which are defined as falls of 20% or more, according to Dow Jones Market Data.