Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
2/2

Продолжаем разбор ответов Part 3. Лексика и грамматика здесь на среднюю шестерку.

Lexical Resource

Спикер использует достаточно широкий словарный запас, его хватает для рассуждения на заданную тему, доносит мысли в большей степени ясно. Есть попытки использовать более точную, специфичную лексику (whinging, cranky); устойчивые словосочетания (true love, have some fun, feel more comfortable), но поскольку случаются повторы лексики, и в целом, количество попыток разнообразить вокабуляр небольшое, выше 6 здесь не получить.

Grammatical range and accuracy

Спикер использует сочетание простых и сложных структур, но не всегда безошибочно.

Часто используются комплексные структуры
— relative clause (who, which, that etc) - people who are whinging
— adverbial clause (after, as soon, as, in order to etc) - a women want to get married as soon as they can
— условные предложения - they feel more comfortable if they get someone with them.

Но речь содержит ошибки (yes, it change / I don't know a lot of people changed their mind / people who are whingings / a women want to get married / they feel more comfortable if they get someone with them etc.), но смысл сказанного все равно остается понятен.

Сейчас мы разобрали баллы по лексике и грамматике, а хотите подобный пост по критерию fluency & coherence?

With love, teacher



tg-me.com/wlteacher/641
Create:
Last Update:

2/2

Продолжаем разбор ответов Part 3. Лексика и грамматика здесь на среднюю шестерку.

Lexical Resource

Спикер использует достаточно широкий словарный запас, его хватает для рассуждения на заданную тему, доносит мысли в большей степени ясно. Есть попытки использовать более точную, специфичную лексику (whinging, cranky); устойчивые словосочетания (true love, have some fun, feel more comfortable), но поскольку случаются повторы лексики, и в целом, количество попыток разнообразить вокабуляр небольшое, выше 6 здесь не получить.

Grammatical range and accuracy

Спикер использует сочетание простых и сложных структур, но не всегда безошибочно.

Часто используются комплексные структуры
— relative clause (who, which, that etc) - people who are whinging
— adverbial clause (after, as soon, as, in order to etc) - a women want to get married as soon as they can
— условные предложения - they feel more comfortable if they get someone with them.

Но речь содержит ошибки (yes, it change / I don't know a lot of people changed their mind / people who are whingings / a women want to get married / they feel more comfortable if they get someone with them etc.), но смысл сказанного все равно остается понятен.

Сейчас мы разобрали баллы по лексике и грамматике, а хотите подобный пост по критерию fluency & coherence?

With love, teacher

BY With love, teacher


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 280

Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/wlteacher/641

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Withloveteacher Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.

At a time when the Indian stock market is peaking and has rallied immensely compared to global markets, there are companies that have not performed in the last 10 years. These are definitely a minor portion of the market considering there are hundreds of stocks that have turned multibagger since 2020. What went wrong with these stocks? Reasons vary from corporate governance, sectoral weakness, company specific and so on. But the more important question is, are these stocks worth buying?

Withloveteacher from tw


Telegram With love, teacher
FROM USA