ℂ𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕔 𝔸𝕡𝕠𝕝𝕠𝕘𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕤

ℂ𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕔 𝔸𝕡𝕠𝕝𝕠𝕘𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕤

Photo

For those Idiotic Protestants who still Accuse Our Blessed Mother of Not Being a Virgin .

First take a look at the bible.....
1 Corinthians 15:6 (NRSVCE)

⁶Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died.

OBVIOUSLY JESUS DIDN'T HAVE 500 BROTHERS .

The reason being the New Testament was written in Greek and ... Greek and Aramaic Both have No Word equivalent for "Cousin". And they substitute the word Brother(Adelphos) as the closest possible term . Even today in English we Call People "Bro" or "Brother" , This not make them Our Real Uterine brothers Obviously 😁. So this is again Protestants being Stupid .

Even Calvin used to establish the fact of Mary’s perpetual virginity, which he believed (based primarily on Scripture alone),as did Luther, Zwingli, Bullinger, and many later prominent, theologically conservative, and scholarly Protestants (such as John Wesley).

By comparing Matthew 27:56, Mark 15:40, and John 19:25, we find
that James and Joseph — mentioned in Matthew 13:55 with Simon and
Jude as Jesus’ “brothers” — are also called sons of Mary, wife of
Clopas. This other Mary (Matthew 27:61, 28:1) is called our Lady’s adelphe in John 19:25 (it isn’t likely that there were two women
named “Mary” in one family — thus even this usage apparently means
“cousin” or more distant relative).


"ἀδελφοί / αδελφός" (adelphoi/Adelphous) may have well been the Word used for "Brothers/Brother" in Greek Both for Blood brothers and Cousins . But when "συγγενεῦσιν" (syngeneusin) is Applied.... It always Means A Cousin or Relative And Never and a Blood Brother!!


Matthew 13:55-56 and Mark 6:3
mention Simon, Jude, and “sisters” along with James and Joseph,
calling all adelphoi. Since we know for sure that at least James and
Joseph are not Jesus’ blood brothers, the most likely interpretation of
Matthew 13:55 is that all these “brothers” are cousins, according to the linguistic conventions discussed above.

www.tg-me.com/tw/telegram/com.CATHOLICAPOLOGETICSANDPOLEMICS/3821

737 viewsMay 29 at 16:41

For those Idiotic Protestants who still Accuse Our Blessed Mother of Not Being a Virgin .

First take a look at the bible.....
1 Corinthians 15:6 (NRSVCE)

⁶Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died.

OBVIOUSLY JESUS DIDN'T HAVE 500 BROTHERS .

The reason being the New Testament was written in Greek and ... Greek and Aramaic Both have No Word equivalent for "Cousin". And they substitute the word Brother(Adelphos) as the closest possible term . Even today in English we Call People "Bro" or "Brother" , This not make them Our Real Uterine brothers Obviously 😁. So this is again Protestants being Stupid .

Even Calvin used to establish the fact of Mary’s perpetual virginity, which he believed (based primarily on Scripture alone),as did Luther, Zwingli, Bullinger, and many later prominent, theologically conservative, and scholarly Protestants (such as John Wesley).

By comparing Matthew 27:56, Mark 15:40, and John 19:25, we find
that James and Joseph — mentioned in Matthew 13:55 with Simon and
Jude as Jesus’ “brothers” — are also called sons of Mary, wife of
Clopas. This other Mary (Matthew 27:61, 28:1) is called our Lady’s adelphe in John 19:25 (it isn’t likely that there were two women
named “Mary” in one family — thus even this usage apparently means
“cousin” or more distant relative).


"ἀδελφοί / αδελφός" (adelphoi/Adelphous) may have well been the Word used for "Brothers/Brother" in Greek Both for Blood brothers and Cousins . But when "συγγενεῦσιν" (syngeneusin) is Applied.... It always Means A Cousin or Relative And Never and a Blood Brother!!


Matthew 13:55-56 and Mark 6:3
mention Simon, Jude, and “sisters” along with James and Joseph,
calling all adelphoi. Since we know for sure that at least James and
Joseph are not Jesus’ blood brothers, the most likely interpretation of
Matthew 13:55 is that all these “brothers” are cousins, according to the linguistic conventions discussed above.

BY ℂ𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕔 𝔸𝕡𝕠𝕝𝕠𝕘𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕤