tg-me.com/KeepNaive233_pixiv_Setu/541
Last Update:
BY KeepNaive的P站setu精选
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn1.cdn-telegram.org/file/VEySxduFRRYyx7vdjnS4xBjRjir6YDuI6z1cPydS8WbmWFE4F2sLIODPfKFa6QtCmDkrexyaqkfKvifwWbG8eTsGpGxuMX0tFLLK2qY7r1UP_WJfCSx4ihIPAhJupeTYZdKnXT4d6dKt1r6aGsXwK7f5fh4MM3Ricd4iHyKqGgnVz3n3KeWVwt79uL_2eOkSxNdrYw-wV8NEA_EchWaNpu5VLioCNs7f6o1x6cGMQawpKEEkXC0mXy9SQcSDhMcww7HNO7nc9vpTrPXsvPxEH8a9ZGev99NaWRWTNeVjKRp32eG5kFyHMeVSxqxJ5fbjvb1dMEJLx5pUmYvw6I1hWw.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/KeepNaive233_pixiv_Setu/541
BY KeepNaive的P站setu精选
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
KeepNaive的P站setu精选 from ye