tg-me.com/zain1970/21877
Last Update:
BY لنَبلوهم
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/LX6ThW1RME-mL5z7ofPdsBePbere2vSgvpUPoC9kJ3ipASjJB-Dj8gMgl_ohbYL6m5g_3Se1a-KtYEuF4RwApPENRNR0VfzsA1dONX6bEQERGsdDzopBGWJkkpnGZmTk1tP47h2MJofh4Bo4A7i1SwXEYU04iVI_JHMxljUynM--Ci4QcE6CnSSP2_BrFyNeW3qTgJLh8moiIS4JK6e_9pj-cnpu3EyLC3ze77PQc_jNT8NxIhhv559XaVtJM1rT1IWztPPZjINyZ_KgRoMzpk5vUU2dN6QbiFy88assGqlh9TZddF6Q0wJgCH6320dSW7q0bV68xY5axtpq_Wiccw.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/zain1970/21877
BY لنَبلوهم
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
لنَبلوهم from us